Building lasting habits and breaking down big decisions
Identity-based habits AND decision breakdown steps
Part I: How to build a lasting habit
If you want to build a lasting habit, ask yourself: โ๐๐ก๐จ ๐๐ฆ ๐ ๐ฏ๐จ๐ญ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ญ๐จ ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฐ๐๐ซ?โ
I had good grades through school. They started falling in freshman year. โIโm smart,โ I reassured myself. I waited for things to change.ย
Nothing did. My friends were the brightest young minds in the country. I was no longer smarter. But because I identified as smart, I did what I had always done: I worked only when I had to. For short bursts, I pushed myself but in the face of sketchy results, I lost motivation.ย
What happened?ย
๐ ๐ก๐๐ ๐ญ๐ซ๐ข๐๐ ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐ก๐๐ง๐ ๐ ๐ฆ๐ฒ ๐ก๐๐๐ข๐ญ๐ฌ (๐ฌ๐ญ๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐ฆ๐จ๐ซ๐ ๐ซ๐๐ ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐๐ซ๐ฅ๐ฒ) ๐ฐ๐ข๐ญ๐ก๐จ๐ฎ๐ญ ๐๐ก๐๐ง๐ ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ฆ๐ฒ ๐ข๐๐๐ง๐ญ๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ (๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐ฌ๐ฆ๐๐ซ๐ญ ๐๐ฎ๐ญ ๐ก๐๐ซ๐-๐ฐ๐จ๐ซ๐ค๐ข๐ง๐ ).
Our identities are powerful forces. At the very basic, they are labels. At their core, they carry a force that can hold us back or propel us forward.ย
James Clear, author of Atomic Habits, suggests approaching habit change by building your desired identity first. See yourself as an athlete and youโll run, good day or bad.ย
He compares building a habit to voting to power the person you want to become. The present you is in power today but the new you can win by collecting more votes.ย Votes are actions. Persist with good actions and the votes for the new you stack up. Youโre on track to topple the incumbent!ย
Now imagine the campaign without your future self. Thereโs only one candidateโthe current you. You donโt like her but in the absence of an alternative, the status quo prevails. That is what had happened to the freshman me.ย
๐๐ข๐ฉ 1: ๐๐๐๐ง๐ญ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐๐ฌ ๐ฐ๐จ๐ซ๐ค ๐๐จ๐ซ ๐๐ฎ๐ข๐ฅ๐๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ก๐๐๐ข๐ญ๐ฌ ๐๐๐๐๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ฒ ๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐๐๐ฅ๐ข๐ฌ๐ก ๐ซ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ญ ๐๐ซ๐๐ ๐ฎ๐ฉ ๐ฒ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ ๐๐๐๐ข๐ฌ๐ข๐จ๐ง-๐ฆ๐๐ค๐ข๐ง๐ . ๐๐ ๐ฒ๐จ๐ฎ ๐ฌ๐๐ ๐ฒ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ฌ๐๐ฅ๐ ๐๐ฌ ๐ ๐ฐ๐ซ๐ข๐ญ๐๐ซ, ๐ฒ๐จ๐ฎ ๐ฐ๐๐ค๐ ๐ฎ๐ฉ ๐๐ฏ๐๐ซ๐ฒ ๐ฆ๐จ๐ซ๐ง๐ข๐ง๐ ๐๐ง๐ ๐ฐ๐ซ๐ข๐ญ๐. ๐๐จ ๐ก๐ข๐ญ๐ญ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ฌ๐ง๐จ๐จ๐ณ๐ ๐๐ง๐ ๐ญ๐๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ฒ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ฌ๐๐ฅ๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ญ ๐ฒ๐จ๐ฎโ๐ฏ๐ ๐๐๐๐ง ๐ ๐จ๐จ๐ ๐๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐ฐ๐๐๐ค.
๐๐ข๐ฉ 2: ๐๐ก๐ ๐ฏ๐จ๐ญ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ฌ๐ฒ๐ฌ๐ญ๐๐ฆ ๐ก๐๐ฌ ๐ ๐ฌ๐๐๐จ๐ง๐๐๐ซ๐ฒ ๐๐๐ง๐๐๐ข๐ญ. ๐๐ญ ๐๐ฅ๐ฅ๐จ๐ฐ๐ฌ ๐ฒ๐จ๐ฎ ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐ ๐ค๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ญ๐จ ๐ฒ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ฌ๐๐ฅ๐. ๐๐จ๐ฎ ๐๐จ๐งโ๐ญ ๐ก๐๐ฏ๐ ๐ญ๐จ ๐ฐ๐ข๐ง ๐๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ฏ๐จ๐ญ๐๐ฌ, ๐ฃ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ญ ๐ฆ๐จ๐ซ๐. ๐๐จ ๐ข๐ ๐ฒ๐จ๐ฎ ๐๐จ ๐ก๐ข๐ญ ๐ฌ๐ง๐จ๐จ๐ณ๐, ๐ฒ๐จ๐ฎ ๐ช๐ฎ๐ข๐๐ค๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐ฅ๐๐๐ซ๐ง ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐จ๐ซ๐ ๐ข๐ฏ๐ ๐ฒ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ฌ๐๐ฅ๐ ๐๐ง๐ ๐ ๐๐ญ ๐ฒ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ ๐๐๐ฆ๐ฉ๐๐ข๐ ๐ง ๐๐๐๐ค ๐จ๐ง ๐ญ๐ซ๐๐๐ค.ย
If the identity-first system appeals to you, this is how some elite professionals have applied it to their lives.
Affirmation - Scott Adams, creator of Dilbert, repeatedly wrote down I, Scott Adams, will become a successful cartoonist! on a piece of paper every day. It helped him internalize his future self. When his motivation dropped, he would ask: What would a successful cartoonist do?ย
Public self-identification - In his early twenties, investor-philosopher Naval Ravikant wanted to start his own company. Finding himself dawdling, he announced to his co-workers that he was going to found a start-up. Once word spread, he could not back out for his own reputation.
Part II: How to break down a big decision
๐๐ก๐๐ญ ๐๐ข๐ ๐๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐๐ช๐ฎ๐๐ง๐ญ๐ข๐๐ฅ-๐ข๐ซ๐ซ๐๐ฏ๐๐ซ๐ฌ๐ข๐๐ฅ๐ ๐๐๐๐ข๐ฌ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐ฒ๐จ๐ฎ'๐ฏ๐ ๐ญ๐จ ๐ฆ๐๐ค๐ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฒ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ ๐๐๐ญ๐๐ฅ๐ข๐ฑ ๐ฌ๐ฉ๐๐๐ข๐๐ฅ. ๐๐จ๐ฐ ๐ฐ๐จ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ ๐ฒ๐จ๐ฎ ๐๐ฉ๐ฉ๐ซ๐จ๐๐๐ก ๐ข๐ญ?
There are two ways:
๐๐ข๐ง๐๐๐ซ: Think of all funny premises, write all your jokes, practise before the mirror, re-write and re-practise, go out and shoot your special hoping the set works out.ย
OR
๐๐ญ๐๐ซ๐๐ญ๐ข๐ฏ๐: Scribble down your joke-lets, go to clubs and try them out before live audiences, get instant feedback, chuck out the ones that fail, refine what could work better, and redo the steps until youโre confident of every joke. Then put everything together into a set.
Weโre more used to linear. ๐๐จ๐จ๐ ๐๐๐๐ข๐ฌ๐ข๐จ๐ง-๐ฆ๐๐ค๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ข๐ญ๐๐ซ๐๐ญ๐ข๐ฏ๐โ๐ซ๐ฎ๐ง๐ง๐ข๐ง๐ ๐๐ฑ๐ฉ๐๐ซ๐ข๐ฆ๐๐ง๐ญ๐ฌ ๐ฌ๐ข๐ฆ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ญ๐๐ง๐๐จ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐๐ง๐ ๐ฅ๐๐๐ซ๐ง๐ข๐ง๐ ๐๐ซ๐จ๐ฆ ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ฆ ๐๐๐๐จ๐ซ๐ ๐ ๐จ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐ข๐ง.
The trick when considering a consequential-irreversible decision is to ask: ๐๐ก๐๐ญ ๐ฌ๐ฆ๐๐ฅ๐ฅ๐๐ซ ๐๐๐๐ข๐ฌ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ญ ๐๐ซ๐ ๐ฅ๐๐ฌ๐ฌ ๐๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐๐ช๐ฎ๐๐ง๐ญ๐ข๐๐ฅ ๐จ๐ซ ๐ฆ๐จ๐ซ๐ ๐ซ๐๐ฏ๐๐ซ๐ฌ๐ข๐๐ฅ๐ ๐ฐ๐ข๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐ก๐๐ฅ๐ฉ ๐ฆ๐ ๐ฌ๐จ๐ซ๐ญ ๐จ๐ฎ๐ญ ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐๐ข๐ ๐๐๐๐ข๐ฌ๐ข๐จ๐ง?
By breaking down a decision what we do is understand the key variables, manage our risks, and position ourselves to be flexible.
Typical big decisions pertain to career, finances, or relationships. Letโs imagine youโre trying to decide which career to pursue. The smaller questions could be: Do I want to commit to a job? Or, do I want to go to school and upskill first? If I want work experience, what is the ideal profile of companies I should look at? Then, can I do an internship with any? And so on.
๐๐ ๐ฒ๐จ๐ฎ ๐๐จ๐งโ๐ญ ๐ก๐๐ฏ๐ ๐ ๐๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐๐ช๐ฎ๐๐ง๐ญ๐ข๐๐ฅ-๐ข๐ซ๐ซ๐๐ฏ๐๐ซ๐ฌ๐ข๐๐ฅ๐ ๐๐๐๐ข๐ฌ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐ญ๐จ ๐ฆ๐๐ค๐, ๐ญ๐๐ค๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ง๐๐ฑ๐ญ ๐๐ข๐ ๐จ๐ง๐โ๐ ๐๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐๐ช๐ฎ๐๐ง๐ญ๐ข๐๐ฅ-๐ซ๐๐ฏ๐๐ซ๐ฌ๐ข๐๐ฅ๐ ๐๐๐๐ข๐ฌ๐ข๐จ๐ง. Breaking it down will teach you something to apply later and will clear the decks for the big ones coming your way in the future.ย
๐๐ข๐ฉ 1: A good way to find out if you're working on the right things is to take any specific question occupying your mind and see if it links back to the big decision youโve identified. If it doesnโt, take a close look at your calendar and rearrange things to reflect your priorities.ย
๐๐ข๐ฉ 2: If you have no consequential decisionsโhighly unlikelyโborrow one from the future. You will thank yourself for having done this.
If being able to differentiate between decisions is the first step, breaking down the biggest ones is the next. It gives you a bigger margin for error. So if you have a big decision to make, break it down.
Bonus: How to approach decision-making
If you run your internal decision-making system like a 1-click payments business whose worth is measured by the gross merchandise value across transactions, then you are using it wrong.
The single-click checkout system of our brains is anything but robust. Or consistent.ย
It needs a lot more attention. You need to be not hungry, or tired, or emotional. You need to watch your own biases that tilt how the world appears to you. And you need, from time to time, to be able to clean the lens with which you see the world.ย
And thatโs just for starters. ๐๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ ๐ง๐จ๐ง๐๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐๐ข๐จ๐ฎ๐ฌ ๐๐ซ๐๐ข๐ง ๐ ๐๐ญ๐ฌ ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐๐ข๐๐ฌ ๐จ๐ง ๐๐ง๐ฒ ๐๐ก๐๐ฅ๐ฅ๐๐ง๐ ๐.ย Thatโs how youโre built. You need to learn to disengage that and engage your conscious brainโthe part that can weigh pros and cons and think forward and backward.
Why bother, you may ask? Iโve been making decisions all my life and Iโm fine.ย
Think of this*: โSomeone who makes decisions right 80% of the time instead of 70% of the time will be valued and compensated in the market hundreds of times more. I think people have a hard time understanding that, but thatโs a fundamental fact of leverage. If Iโm managing $1 billion and Iโm right 10% more of the time than somebody else, then thatโs $100 million worth of value on a judgment call. With modern technology and large workforces and capital, our decisions are getting leveraged more and more.โ
And work is really just one thing. Better decision-making seeps into life. Whether you want financial freedom before retirement or you want to live healthy or you want to be a good parent and spouse, good decisions today make for a better life tomorrow.ย
*Quote by Naval Ravikant